| 7,844 | 216 | 207 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在传播学视角下,可供性理论有助于洞察互联网平台和用户复杂的互动关系。本文将对多学科视角下的可供性研究、传播学视角下的平台可供性研究和互联网平台研究的可供性分析路径进行梳理,并提出中国语境下互联网平台可供性研究的理论启示,具体包括:应当避免将可供性简化理解为技术特性,注重在研究中更多引入平台与用户的互动的考察视角,针对算法可供性等技术维度的问题开展实证研究,对不同类型互联网平台开展可供性的比较研究以及在平台可供性研究中强化传播政治经济学的理论视角。
Abstract：(1)翟文婷、史小兵:《快手为什么能析抓住沉默的大多数》[J],《中国企业家》,2017年第Z1期,第59-65页。
(2)Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].New York:Psychology Press,1986:127.
(3)(4)Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1979.
(5)Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].New York:Psychology Press,1986:138.
(6)(7)Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].New York:Psychology Press,1986:128.
(8)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:237.
(9)Norman,D.The Design of Everyday Things-Revised and ExpandedEdition[M].Philadelphia:Basic Books,2013:11.
(10)Norman,D.The Design of Everyday Things[M].New York:Doubleday Business,1990:8-9.
(11)Norman,D.The Design of Everyday Things-Revised and Expanded Edition[M].Philadelphia:Basic Books,2013:12.
(12)Gaver,W.(1996)Situating action II:Affordances for interaction:The social is material for DesignQ].Ecological Psychology 8(2):111-129.
(13)(14)Gaver,W.(1991)Technology affordances.In:Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,ACM,pp.79-84.
(15)Gibson J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Classic Editions[M].New York:Psychology Press,2015:127.
(16)相关文献包括:Still,A W.,and Good,J.M.M.(1991).Beyond social affordances:The flow of information in social kinesthesis.Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Perception and Action(Amsterdam,25-30 August).International Society for Ecological Psychology:Amsterdam.Goldring,P.(1991).Early steps towards language:How social affordances educate attention.Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Perception and Action(Amsterdam,25-30 August).International Society for Ecological Psychology:Amsterdam.Gaver,W.(1996).Affordances forinteraction:The social is material for design[J].Ecological Psychology 8(2),111-129.
(17)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:241.
(18)Wellman,B.,Quan-Haase,A.,Boase,J.,et al.(2003).The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8(3).
(19)Postigo,H.(2016).The socio-technical architecture of digital labor:Converting play into YouTube money[J].New Media&Society 18(2):332-349.
(20)(32)Schrock,A,R.(2015).Communicative Affordances of Mobile Media:Portability,Availability,Lo catability,and Multimediality[J].International Journal of Communication 9(0):1229-1246.
(21)(23)(27)Hutchby,I.Conversation and Technology:From the Telephone to the Internet[M].Cambridge,UK:Polity,2001.,
(22)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:243.
(24)潘忠党、刘于思:《以何为“新”?“新媒体”话语中的权力陷阱与研究者的理论自省——潘忠党教授访谈录》[J],《新闻与传播评论》,2017年第1期。
(25)Boyd,D.Social network sites as networked publics:Affordances,dynamics,and implications.In:Papacharissi Z(ed.),A Networked self:identity,community,and culture on social network sites[M],New York:Routledge,2011:39-46.
(26)Treem,J,W.&Leonardi,P,M.(2012).Social media use in organizations:Exploring the affordances of visibility,editability,persistence,and association.Communication yearbook 36:143-189.
(27)Karahanna,E.,Xu,S.X.,Xu,Y.,Zhang,N.The needs-affordances-features perspective for the use of social media[J].MIS Quarterly,2018,42(3):737-756.
(29)Bucher,T., Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick, T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:234.
(30)Sajtos,L.,Beh,Y,S.,Peko,G.,Sundaram,D.Developing an affordance-based conceptualization of social media interactions.Twenty-fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems,Cancun,2019.
(31)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:245.
(33)(35)Nagy,P.&Neff,G.(2015).Imagined Affordance:Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory[J].Social Media+Society 1(2).
(34)Eslami,M.,Rickman,A.,Vaccaro,K.,Aleyasen,A.,Vuong,A.,Karahalios,K.,...Sandvig,C."I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to[her]":Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds.In B.Begole&J.Kim(Eds.),Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Seoul,Republic of Korea:ACM Press,2015:153-162.
(36)Bucher,T.(2016).The algorithmic imaginary:exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms[J].Information,Communication&Society 0(0):1-15.
(37)(38)McVeigh-Schultz,J&Baynm,N,K.(2015).Thinking of You:Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App,Couple[J].Social Media+Society 1(2).
(39)(40)(41)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:255-257.
(42)Hookway,B.Interface[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2014:13-14.
(43)(45)Bucher,T.,&Helniond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:257-258.
(44)Van Dijck,J.The Culture of Connectivity:A Critical History of SocialMedia[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2013.
(46)(47)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:259-261.
(48)(49)(50)Bucher,T.,&Helmond,A.The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.In J.Burgess,A.Marwick,&T.Poell(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Social Media[M].London and New York:Sage Publications,2018:261-263.
(51)Tandoc,E.C.J.,Lou,C.,&Min,V.L.H.(2019).Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context:how and why users navigate multiple social media platforms?[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,?24(1),21-35.
(52)Jones,E.(2020).What does Facebook'afford do-it-yourself musicians?Considering social media affordances as sites of contestation[J].Media,Culture&Society,42(2):227-292.
(53)Van Dijck,J.,Poell,T.,de Waal,M.The platform society:Public values in a connected world[M],Oxford:Oxford University,2018:160.
(54)王茜:《可供性视角下的算法研究——韩国中央大学申东熙教授访谈》[J],《青年记者》,2019年第12月。
(55)Van Dijck,J.,Poell,T.,de Waal,M.The platform society:Public values in a connected world[M],Oxford:Oxford University,2018:38.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G206
引用信息:
[1]张志安,黄桔琳.传播学视角下互联网平台可供性研究及启示[J].新闻与写作,2020,No.436(10):87-95.
基金信息:
2016教育部哲学社科研究重大课题攻关项目“大数据时代国家意识形态安全风险与防范体系构建研究”（编号16JZD006）
2020-10-05
2020-10-05