| 1,705 | 17 | 231 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
平台治理的相关问题涉及到政府、平台、用户等多主体之间的关系,平台的自我规制和政府规制之间的冲突调节成为平台治理中的重点问题。本文聚焦用户这一主体,以平台中的有害评论为具体情境,运用第三人效果理论、责任归因理论、代理控制理论,探究用户呼吁政府监管平台的心理机制,借此透视用户如何认识媒体规制领域的国家和市场、自我治理和外在规制之间的关系。用户对公共监管的需求也可以理解为用户参与内容治理的一种方式。尽管用户在主体结构中处于较为弱势的地位,但并不是完全被动,而是通过观念和行动反作用于结构,用户的政策取向可以为实践提供参照。
Abstract:(1)蔡润芳:《“积极受众”的价值生产--论传播政治经济学“受众观”与Web2.0“受众劳动论”之争》,《国际新闻界》,2018年第3期,第114-131页。
(2)Davison,W.P.(1983).The Third-Person Effect in Communication.The Public Opinion Quarterly,47(1),1-15.
(3)Gunther,A.C.,&Storey,J.D.(2003).The influence of presumed influence.Journal of Communication,53(2),199-215.
(4)Gunther,A.C.,Bolt,D.,Borzekowski,D.L.G.,Liebhart,J.L.,&Dillard,J.P.(2006).Presumed Influence on Peer Norms:How Mass Media Indirectly Affect Adolescent Smoking.Journal of Communication,56(1),52-68.
(5)Cohen,J.,&Tsfati,Y.(2009).The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Strategic Voting.Communication Research,36(3),359-378.
(6)Tal-Or,N.,Tsfati,Y.,&Gunther,A.C.(2009).The influence of presumed media influence:Origins and implications of the third-person perception.In R.L.Nabi&M.B.Oliver (Eds.),The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp.99-112):Sage.
(7)Sherrick,B.(2016).The Effects of Media Effects:Third-Person Effects,the Influence of Presumed Media Influence,and Evaluations of Media Companies.Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly,93(4),906-922.
(8)Ziegele,M.,Naab,T.K.,&Jost,P.(2019).Lonely together?Identifying the determinants of collective corrective action against uncivil comments.New Media&Society,22(5),731-751.
(9)付佳、陈晓琳、喻国明:《“第三人效果”研究的范式迭代:现象、影响因素及理论机制》,《中国新闻传播研究》,2020年第3期,第107-130页。
(10)Scharrer,E.,&Leone,R.(2008).First-Person Shooters and the Third-Person Effect.Human Communication Research,34(2),210-233.
(11)Sun,Y.,Shen,L.,&Pan,Z.(2008).On the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect.Communication Research,35(2),257-278.
(12)Cheng,Y.,&Chen,Z.F.(2020).The Influence of Presumed Fake News Influence:Examining Public Support for Corporate Corrective Response,Media Literacy Interventions,and Governmental Regulation.Mass Communication and Society,23(5),705-729.
(13)Lee,T.(2021).How people perceive influence of fake news and why it matters.Communication Quarterly,69(4),431-453.
(14)Xu,J.,&Gonzenbach,W.J.(2008).Does a Perceptual Discrepancy Lead to Action?A Meta-analysis of the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,20(3),375-385.
(15)Helberger,N.,Pierson,J.,&Poell,T.(2018).Governing online platforms:From contested to cooperative responsibility.?The information society,?34(1),1-14.
(16)Coombs,W.T.(2007).Protecting organization reputations during a crisis:The development and application of situational crisis communication theory.Corporate reputation review,10(3),163-176.
(17)Coombs,W.T.(2007).Protecting organization reputations during a crisis:The development and application of situational crisis communication theory.Corporate reputation review,10(3),163-176.
(18)Jeong,S.-H.,Yum,J.,&Hwang,Y.(2018).Effects of Media Attributions on Responsibility Judgments and Policy Opinions.Mass Communication and Society,21(1),24-49.
(19)Bandura A (2001)Social cognitive theory:an agentic perspective.Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
(20)周逵、黄典林、董晨宇:《国家与市场之间的“调和人”:传媒转型与治理中行业协会的角色功能》,《新闻与传播研究》,2020年第12期,第40-61+127页。
(21)王维佳、周弘:《规制与扩张的“双向运动”:中国平台经济的演进历程》,《新闻与传播研究》,2021年增刊,第76-90+127页。
(22)谢新洲、朱垚颖:《网络内容治理发展态势与应对策略研究》,《新闻与写作》,2020年第4期,第76-82页。
(23)Ji,Y.,&Kim,S.(2020).Crisis-induced public demand for regulatory intervention in the social media era:Examining the moderating roles of perceived government controllability and consumer collective efficacy.New Media&Society,22(6),959-983.
(24)Riedl,M.J.,Naab,T.K.,Masullo,G.M.,Jost,P.,&Ziegele,M.(2021).Who is responsible for interventions against problematic comments?Comparing user attitudes in Germany and the United States.Policy&Internet.
(25)Ji,Y.,&Kim,S.(2020).Crisis-induced public demand for regulatory intervention in the social media era:Examining the moderating roles of perceived government controllability and consumer collective efficacy.New Media&Society,22(6),959-983.
(26)Naab,T.K.,Naab,T.,&Brandmeier,J.(2019).Uncivil User Comments Increase Users’Intention to Engage in Corrective Actions and Their Support for Authoritative Restrictive Actions.Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly,98(2),566-588.
(27)Ji,Y.,&Kim,S.(2020).Crisis-induced public demand for regulatory intervention in the social media era:Examining the moderating roles of perceived government controllability and consumer collective efficacy.New Media&Society,22(6),959-983.
(28)Hayes,A.F.(2017).Introduction to Mediation,Moderation,and Conditional Process Analysis,Second Edition:A Regression-Based Approach:Guilford Publications.
(29)Helberger,N.,Pierson,J.,&Poell,T.(2018).Governing online platforms:From contested to cooperative responsibility.?The information society,?34(1),1-14.
(30)Norman,D.(2013).The Design of Everyday Things:Revised and Expanded Edition:Basic Books.
(31)吴靖:《“算法”具有自由意志吗?--算法主导社会行为背后的几个悖论》,《中国出版》,2019年第2期,第7-11页。
(32)晏齐宏:《二元性互构:选择性接触影响下的青年网络政治意见表达》,《新闻大学》,2020年第9期,第56-78+121页。
(33)Chung,S.,&Moon,S.-I.(2016).Is the Third-Person Effect Real?A Critical Examination of Rationales,Testing Methods,and Previous Findings of the Third-Person Effect on Censorship Attitudes.Human Communication Research,42(2),312-337.
(34)Golan,G.J.(2008).Moving Beyond the Perceptual Component of the Third-Person Effect:The Influence of Presumed Influence on Behavior.American Behavioral Scientist,52(2),143-146.
(35)肖梦黎:《平台型企业的权力生成与规制选择研究》,《河北法学》,2020年第10期,第73-87页。
(36)孔祥稳:《网络平台信息内容规制结构的公法反思》,《环球法律评论》,2020年第2期,第133-148页。
(37)宫贺、韩冬、张庆园:《多元归因与信任重建:危机传播情境理论的中国情境--以2018年问题疫苗事件为例》,《新闻与传播研究》,2019年第6期,第16-35+126页。
(38)周逵:《反向融合:中国大陆媒体融合逻辑的另一种诠释》,《新闻记者》,2019年第3期,第45-51页。
(39)顾昕:《走向互动式治理:国家治理体系创新中“国家-市场-社会关系”的变革》,《学术月刊》,2019年第1期,第77-86页。
(40)虞鑫、兰旻:《媒介治理:国家治理体系中的媒介角色--反思新自由主义的传播与政治》,《当代传播》,2020年第6期,第34-38页。
基本信息:
中图分类号:G206;D630
引用信息:
[1]谢新洲,宋琢.用户视角下的平台责任与政府控制——一个有调节的中介模型[J].新闻与写作,2021,No.450(12):13-23.
基金信息:
国家社科基金重大项目“中国特色网络内容治理体系及监管模式研究”(项目号:18ZDA317)的成果之一
2021-12-05
2021-12-05